← Search

Erica Kuhl

Boulder, CO
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 41W–11L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Erica Kuhl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2025-04-20 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joshua Harrison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-13 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Esteban de Arcos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-1
W
2024-06-02 · LTA-Q RED · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Kuhl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-05-21 · BCC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachael Sparks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-14 · BCC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Munson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-07 · BCC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cat Diehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2024-04-23 · BCC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brigette Paige
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
Daniel Jackson / Hanna Grow-Morales
2023-09-16 · #2 Doubles · with Matt Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2023-08-06 · CVTA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Craig Hoeltgen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2023-07-23 · CVTA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with AJ Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2023-07-22 · #2 Doubles · with Anish Parikh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-02 · LTA-Q RED · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Kuhl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.9% of games
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 62.9% of games
4.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 60.4% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.4% of games
8.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#1 Singles
21%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe