← Search

Joe Sampson

Waldorf, MD
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 8W–12L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Joe Sampson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
L
2026-04-28 · Phung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nhi Phung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-14 · Phung · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Clinton Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-07 · Phung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
Tracy Chen / John Batu
2025-03-14 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Sokoloff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-25 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-21 · Racq Pack · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-09-17 · Smashing 24/7 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan K Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-08-26 · Smashing 24/7 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan K Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-08-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-07-23 · Smashing 24/7 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derrick Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-13 · Hit Men · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Issac Mance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
N/A
2022-10-22 · Kings and Queens · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nikki Rawls mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 57.8% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match
#1 Singles
5%
1 match
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer