← Search

Wendy Younkin

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
206 matches · 84W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Wendy Younkin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history206 matches
L
2026-08-31 · ACP.Younkin · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Keen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · ACP.Younkin · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Pedraza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · PW.Roussin · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Siping Roussin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · PW.Bologa · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Raasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-15 · PW.Bologa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erika Lipkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · PW.Hayward · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandon Bridgman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-26 · PW.Bologa · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Pedraza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Melissa Raasch / Rebecca King
2026-06-15 · PW.Bologa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Levin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · PW.Hayward · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Younkin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-06 · PW.Hayward · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Younkin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-01 · PW.Bologa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Somol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · PW.Hayward · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Younkin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 66.4% of games
3.0
42.4%
36W–49L · 46.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–10L · 26.3% of games
5.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games
5.5
42.1%
24W–33L · 46% of games
6.5
16.7%
3W–15L · 39.1% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 68.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
48 matches
#3 Singles
4%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova