← Search

Lynn Blocher

— year-end
82 matches · 44W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lynn Blocher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Monesmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Claudia Paz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Claudia Paz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-08 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Brandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Claudia Paz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-25 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Brandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Paz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Jennifer Thomas / Lily Qu
2026-07-01 · Brandon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan McDugald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · Brandon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leena Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Paz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · Brandon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Paz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
64%
16W–9L · 58.3% of games
3.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 51.1% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.8% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 54% of games
7.5
0%
0W–9L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#1 Singles
20%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert