← Search

Linda Maffeo-Melloy

— year-end
188 matches · 102W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Maffeo-Melloy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
L
2026-05-20 · Dangerous Divas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · Dangerous Divas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-17 · Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney McCormick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-17 · Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Fellingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-10 · Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney McCormick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-13 · Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Goss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-09 · Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tymara Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Joan Crines championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-07-23 · Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-06-16 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Penn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Ruben
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberley Cottell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
61.3%
46W–29L · 53.7% of games
3.5
58.7%
27W–19L · 54.3% of games
4.0
31.4%
11W–24L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
43 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova