← Search

Jennifer Coady

Annapolis, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 117W–54L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Coady to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Gunther/Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anh Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-08 · Gunther/Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Mendenhall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Gunther/Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Mendenhall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · Gunther/Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy LaMoure
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-6
W
2026-07-25 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Jacobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-08 · Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-01 · Coady - DayStars · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Birnkammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · Slice Girls · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-24 · Coady - DayStars · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Mendenhall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-22 · Slice Girls · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 82.8% of games
3.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 64.1% of games
3.5
68.4%
54W–25L · 58.3% of games
4.0
63.8%
30W–17L · 54.8% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 85.7% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
39 matches
#1 Singles
15%
25 matches
#2 Singles
6%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal