← Search

Cyndi Casey

Annapolis, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 72W–59L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Cyndi Casey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-09-13 · McVeigh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-09-10 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenae Fadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-31 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · Kelly/Jacobson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Bernhard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-08-23 · McVeigh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott A Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
Julie Anderson / Leann Gibbs
2026-07-12 · Lady Tigers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Casey Royster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-11 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Mulholland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-05 · Martin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Mulholland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Lay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
32%
8W–17L · 44.1% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
100%
5W–0L · 77.9% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 67.4% of games
7.0
60%
15W–10L · 55.5% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 22.6% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 64.7% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
39.3%
11W–17L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal