← Search

Elizabeth Darby

Germantown, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 16W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Darby to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Liz Forbes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · Conrad/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sloane Hankins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · Harris/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Waggoner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · Gibbs/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Noffsinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
Kathryn Carpenter / Faith Ruch
2026-07-14 · Harris/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Waggoner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · Gibbs/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corey Richter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Harris/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Upchurch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Christine Anderson / Markeno Lester
2026-06-23 · Gibbs/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corey Richter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-18 · Harris/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennings Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-15 · Harris/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · Darby/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Brower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · Umansky/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
40.6%
13W–19L · 45.3% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 45% of the time
#1 Singles
45%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
5 matches
#2 Singles
12%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams