← Search

Mary Elizabeth Frederick

— year-end
97 matches · 43W–54L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Mary Elizabeth Frederick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2025-08-07 · MVCC RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Eiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-08-06 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ingrid Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-07-24 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hassinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-23 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-07 · NJ PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-03 · MVCC RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hassinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-02 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-23 · NJ PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Kirby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Christie Bibeau / Elizabeth Shields
2025-06-18 · NJ GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-12 · MVCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hassinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-09 · NJ PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-05-30 · NJ PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daryna Piria
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
60%
27W–18L · 54.1% of games
3.0
22.6%
7W–24L · 40.1% of games
6.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 46.4% of games
5.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams