← Search

Tonia Gardner

— year-end
59 matches · 37W–22L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Tonia Gardner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
Cristy Buziak / Lynn Davis
2026-08-23 · Gilless/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Woodmansee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · Johnson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Johnson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · Dent/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-21 · Burbank/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-13 · Burbank/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
Katie Moore / Meredith Flynn
2025-11-13 · Burbank/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arlie Hanigan-Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-13 · Flanders/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shanna Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lynn Davis / Lisa Bailey
2025-08-23 · Flanders/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Gilless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-08-06 · Carro/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-07-13 · Jackson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 62.8% of games
4.0
52%
13W–12L · 50.3% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.1% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer