← Search

Linda Nuxoll

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 70W–44L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Linda Nuxoll to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-07-20 · TOC.Goetz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Nuxoll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · TOC.Goetz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Nuxoll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-14 · TOC.Goetz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Nuxoll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · TOC.Goetz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Nuxoll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-1
W
2026-06-05 · TOC.Goetz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Nuxoll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Hop.Pflaum40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Parham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · Hop.Pflaum40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Pflaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-23 · Hop.Pflaum55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Beaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · Hop.Pflaum40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-16 · Hop.Pflaum55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Beaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-09 · Hop.Pflaum55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Beaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-08 · Hop.Pflaum40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
65%
13W–7L · 58.3% of games
3.0
63.3%
31W–18L · 57.2% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 33.8% of games
5.5
50%
7W–7L · 50.4% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
34 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe