← Search

Christy van Ness

RALEIGH, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 74W–119L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christy van Ness to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Ki.Lamb55C5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Corinne Alavi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Allison Lee / Laura Lee Gillenwater
2026-08-23 · Je.SagalSolomon18C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michele Nowicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Elena Ryzhikova / Dana Jones
2026-08-20 · Ki.Lamb55C5.5 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Teri Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · Je.SagalSolomon18C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michele Nowicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · Je.SagalSolomon18C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michele Nowicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Ki.Lamb55C5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jo Ann Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Ki.Roberts40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · Ki.Roberts40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Asa Burnham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · Je.SagalSolomon18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-23 · Ki.Lamb55A3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corinne Alavi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-21 · Ki.Roberts40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary-Kate Knox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-20 · Je.SagalSolomon18A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Michaels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 50.8% of games
3.0
18.1%
15W–68L · 35% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
54.7%
35W–29L · 50.1% of games
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.2% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
58 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer