← Search

Zack Cowell

— year-end
54 matches · 35W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Zack Cowell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Whitsitt/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Coyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-06 · Whitsitt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Lackie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Diego Hijano / Ariel Lopez
2026-04-23 · Whitsitt/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-04 · Whitsitt/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · Whitsitt/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Coyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-21 · Whitsitt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cade Benedict
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-19 · Cooper/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Wenzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-09-10 · Bartley/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew McCalla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-09-04 · Bartley/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paul Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-04 · Cooper/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-04-25 · Cooper/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Gagliano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 61.3% of games
4.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.8% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#1 Singles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer