← Search

Karthik Badri

— year-end
65 matches · 41W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karthik Badri to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-06-14 · CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gopal Thirukallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gopal Thirukallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Akhilesh Kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abishek Jhureley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Michael Lee / Jeff Castera
2026-04-19 · CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harshavardhan Dharkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-18 · CM Hackers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gopal Thirukallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · CM Hackers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anirudh Sridharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-07-24 · CENTRAL/CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harshavardhan Dharkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-07-17 · CENTRAL/CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harshavardhan Dharkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-07-10 · CENTRAL/CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harshavardhan Dharkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2022-06-26 · CENTRAL/CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harshavardhan Dharkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-06-25 · CM Hackers Spartans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashok Padmanabhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
62.5%
35W–21L · 51.8% of games
7.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#1 Singles
12%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer