← Search

Leann Olsen

— year-end
18 matches · 10W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Leann Olsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-20 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tiffany Knighton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Drake/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · Hirt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-01 · Hirt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Luckett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-18 · Hirt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Jennifer Hawthorne / Jamie Harris
2025-11-20 · Babcock/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-06 · Babcock/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Sonya Fleck / Jamie Harris
2025-10-21 · Babcock/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-24 · Slater/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-04-16 · Foreman/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.5% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King