← Search

Laura Luckett

— year-end
37 matches · 14W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Laura Luckett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-05-09 · Tomlinson - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-29 · Hirt/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-22 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-09 · Tomlinson - NC - Southaven · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-01 · Hirt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leann Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-29 · Drake/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · Tomlinson - NC - Southaven · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-25 · Hirt/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Burford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
Terry Bondurant / Barbara Wilson
2026-03-22 · Drake/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-18 · Hirt/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · Drake/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ana Paula Pereira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
39.3%
11W–17L · 47.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.9% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer