← Search

Leigh Goerke

Lakewood, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 82W–58L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Leigh Goerke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-09-03 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Gardiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-27 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · LTC-D RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · LTC-D RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · LTC-M YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Stirling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · LTC-M YELLOW · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · LTC-D RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Gardiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · LTC-M YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca BaanHofman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shana Fonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · LTC-D RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Kobayashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-01 · LTC-M YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Santino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · LTC-D RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Gardiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
51.5%
17W–16L · 55.8% of games
2.5
96.2%
25W–1L · 68% of games
3.0
51.6%
32W–30L · 52.1% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 73.1% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 32.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#1 Singles
28%
39 matches
#1 Female Singles
21%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams