← Search

Shana Fonte

Lakewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 81W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shana Fonte to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-09-03 · LTC-D RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-02 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Gardiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-08-27 · LTC-D RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-20 · LTC-D RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-16 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-09 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Goerke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-18 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · KC-RH WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Granath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · LTC-D RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · LTC-D PINK · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Gardiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
54.5%
73W–61L · 52.2% of games
7.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.6% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 48% of the time
#1 Singles
48%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams