← Search

Nevin Shrimanker

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 91W–62L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nevin Shrimanker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Ph.Gugliotta40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John del Vecchio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · Jo.Hoomani18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mitchell Wolborsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-20 · Ph.Gugliotta40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Philip Gugliotta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · Jo.Hoomani18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bradley Eisenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · Ph.Gugliotta40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Philip Gugliotta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · Gr.Swank40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · Ta.Backus18M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taryn Backus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · Gr.Swank40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · Jo.Hoomani40T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitchell Wolborsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Jo.Hoomani40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · Jo.Hoomani40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Hoomani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · Jo.Hoomani40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Hoomani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
67.6%
46W–22L · 56.6% of games
3.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 42.8% of games
6.5
59%
23W–16L · 54.6% of games
3.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.9% of games
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#1 Singles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova