← Search

Karen Hepp

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
272 matches · 174W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Hepp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history272 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Co.Haynes18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Thassia Roschel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-17 · Co.Haynes18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with CAROLINE FLAMANT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-12 · Sh.Littleton40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Hewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-30 · Al.Kalinoski40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Hemminger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · Ga.Fye40M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Sprung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julianne Rothert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer van Campen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · Je.Troch55M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Troch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · Ga.Fye40M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Sprung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · Je.Troch55M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Troch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer van Campen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
68.5%
50W–23L · 58.9% of games
3.5
57.3%
55W–41L · 53.4% of games
5.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 62.8% of games
6.5
67.3%
33W–16L · 55.9% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 50% of games
3.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 53% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
54 matches
#3 Singles
6%
16 matches
#2 Singles
6%
15 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal