← Search

Debbi Holden

Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 31W–21L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Debbi Holden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-05-31 · Mixed Plate · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Toone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-24 · Mixed Plate · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-22 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Volle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · Net Threats · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Klingberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-13 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Tomasa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-08 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Overlund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caryn Barman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-29 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Akina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Volle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-16 · Mixed Plate · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-10 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Madsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-25 · Sweet & Sassy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Overlund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
55.9%
19W–15L · 49.8% of games
7.0
90%
9W–1L · 57.7% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert