← Search

Meghan Roy

— year-end
200 matches · 154W–46L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Meghan Roy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history200 matches
L
2026-07-21 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Sams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-16 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Sams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · with Maureen Sredl championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Dori Mcdarris / Kelly Williams
2026-04-27 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shayna Bolton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Kathy Endres / Leslie Morgan
2026-04-23 · TOC.Goulding · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Eichenseer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · PW.Fekete · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shayna Bolton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · Ro.Bonello40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-16 · TOC.Goulding · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Sredl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-15 · PW.O'Connor · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Eichenseer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
Christine Watson / Michele Wilson
2026-04-13 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Eichenseer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-07 · PW.Fekete · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Dann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-06 · Ro.Bonello40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Sredl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 73.5% of games
3.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 61.9% of games
3.5
91.3%
21W–2L · 63.5% of games
4.0
78.6%
33W–9L · 59.6% of games
4.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 43.1% of games
5.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 81.1% of games
6.5
100%
11W–0L · 68.2% of games
7.5
90%
9W–1L · 68.4% of games
8.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.7% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
126 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
25 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer