← Search

Namita Lokare

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 76W–44L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Namita Lokare to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Le.Barter18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elissa Coughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · Le.Barter18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · La.Cox18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Lauren King / April Bazin
2026-06-20 · La.Cox18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lily Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · La.Cox18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · with Nicole Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Sarah Cecco / Kathryn Horneffer
2026-05-05 · Am.Hobbs18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
Jennifer Hall / Michelle Kurtz
2026-04-25 · Am.Hobbs18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Arcos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · TOC.Hobbs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · TOC.Allen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-12 · TOC.Hobbs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
56.7%
17W–13L · 54.7% of games
3.5
62.2%
28W–17L · 55.8% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 38.3% of games
5.0
100%
4W–0L · 69.8% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.6% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 32% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#2 Singles
10%
12 matches
#1 Singles
8%
10 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert