← Search

Amy Schaap

Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 9W–14L · seasons 2021–2023

Captains: add Amy Schaap to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2023-04-23 · Tracy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emperatriz Fernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-03-26 · Tracy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeri James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-06-29 · Grabowski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michaela Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-15 · Grabowski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Siebken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2022-05-18 · Grabowski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michaela Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2022-05-11 · Grabowski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2022-05-04 · Grabowski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michaela Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-04-03 · Grabowski/Tracy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2022-03-06 · Grabowski/Tracy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2022-02-20 · Grabowski/Tracy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-02-06 · Grabowski/Tracy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel O'Malley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2021-06-30 · Grabowski/Tracy · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#1 Singles
9%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova