← Search

Caroline Hamilton

Durham, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 32W–32L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Caroline Hamilton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-09-10 · MEasterling18C-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacey Burkert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · MEasterling18C-HVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-06 · SEasterling-HVCC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-29 · SEasterling-HVCC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-22 · SEasterling-HVCC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-20 · MBiese-HVCC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-08 · SEasterling-HVCC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-04 · SEasterling-HVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linsey Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-25 · SEasterling-HVCC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-08-24 · SEasterling-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-06-23 · SEasterling-HVCC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-09 · SEasterling-HVCC · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
56.7%
17W–13L · 55.1% of games
4.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 41.5% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.1% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#2 Singles
16%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches
#3 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams