← Search

Jenna Schreiber

Chapel Hill, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 66W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jenna Schreiber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-09-11 · CHaywood-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mackenzie Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · MLong.8.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Franks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · KLaan.40.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Franks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · MLong.8.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hilary Tew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · MLong.4.0-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abraham Post mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-27 · KLaan-UNC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Edgar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · MLong.4.0-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abraham Post mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · KLaan-UNC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · HWhite-UNC · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · KLaan-UNC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · MLong.4.0-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeeka Karnas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · MLong.4.0-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Parikshith Chada mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.1% of games
4.0
57.6%
38W–28L · 53.8% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 15.3% of games
7.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 48.7% of games
8.5
40%
4W–6L · 43.8% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#1 Singles
18%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal