← Search

Beth Dingler

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
179 matches · 116W–63L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Beth Dingler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history179 matches
W
Elizabeth Everett / Stacey Smith
2026-09-14 · BMcGarrah-HR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joyce Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-31 · BMcGarrah-HR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joelle Romac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
Cecily Peterson / Stacey Smith
2026-08-03 · BMcGarrah-HR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joelle Romac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
Katy Patton / Amy Lynch
2026-07-19 · BCleveland-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie DeConto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · BCleveland-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joyce Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · BCleveland-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thuy Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · BCleveland-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becki Cleveland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · JDeConto-Dur · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-20 · BCleveland-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie DeConto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-19 · JDeConto-Dur · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · JDeConto-Dur · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-05 · JDeConto-Dur · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
81.2%
26W–6L · 67.5% of games
3.0
64.1%
50W–28L · 55.6% of games
3.5
50%
12W–12L · 48.9% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 60.6% of games
6.5
60%
15W–10L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
31 matches
#2 Singles
11%
20 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer