← Search

Abbigail Wagner

Wilmington, DE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 85W–44L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Abbigail Wagner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-07-31 · WGK'd Up · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen OBerg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · WGK'd Up · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · WCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roniece DuPont
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · WCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dell'Oso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · Love Me Nots · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dell'Oso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-04 · WCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dell'Oso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-01 · Love Me Nots · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Libke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
Jennifer Jones / Catherine Quigley
2026-04-30 · WCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · Love Me Nots · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-21 · WCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Mester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Lorena Turrent championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 66% of games
3.5
66.2%
53W–27L · 56.2% of games
4.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#1 Singles
21%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
21 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer