← Search

Elizabeth Kim

Kennett Square, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
306 matches · 198W–108L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history306 matches
W
2026-07-07 · Notorious K.I.M. · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dinali Jayanetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · Notorious 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Clearkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Notorious K.I.M. · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcia Keld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · Notorious K.I.M. · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Notorious K.I.M. · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jannie Lau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Notorious 40 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Notorious 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jannie Lau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · Fantastic Girls 18+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen He
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · Fantastic Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Mullin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-07 · Notorious K.I.M. · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-03 · Notorious K.I.M. · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherry Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · Notorious K.I.M. · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
72.4%
55W–21L · 61.9% of games
3.5
67.4%
58W–28L · 55.6% of games
4.0
52.7%
39W–35L · 49.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
74.3%
26W–9L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
42.3%
11W–15L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
60 matches
#1 Singles
17%
52 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer