← Search

Mel Schaefer

— year-end
42 matches · 17W–25L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Mel Schaefer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Craft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Lisa Parker / Jill Holmes
2026-07-30 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · Gilliam/FS/Hangout · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Schaefer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-19 · Gilliam/FS/Hangout · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Warren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · Gilliam/FS/Hangout · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Schaefer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-14 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · Gilliam/FS/Hangout · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Schaefer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
Emily Barr / Christy Williams
2026-07-02 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mischelle Roam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · Gilliam/FS/Hangout · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dzung Vu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
Lisa Parker / Jill Holmes
2026-06-16 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-11 · Wendlandt/Alma/CM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Wendlandt/Alma/CM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deana Deramo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.2% of games
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 40.8% of games
3.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 45.2% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 31% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.7% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#1 Singles
12%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer