← Search

Jessica Irgens

Fort Smith, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 19W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jessica Irgens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-09-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lora Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
Christy Williams / Amanda Daniels
2026-07-28 · Mullens/VB/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Prater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · Williams/FS/VH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Kilgore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · Williams/FS/VH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shane Irgens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-14 · MORRIS/FS/HCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Prater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · Mullens/VB/CM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katy Prater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · Williams/FS/VH · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Hoskyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · MORRIS/FS/HCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Amanda Daniels / Christy Williams
2026-06-25 · Mullens/VB/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Prater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · MORRIS/FS/HCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Prater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-06-17 · MORRIS/FS/HCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · MORRIS/FS/HCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Prater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 49.8% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal