← Search

Britney Taake

Hackett, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 23W–5L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Britney Taake to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-07-30 · Marcotte/FS/HO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emillie Vick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-21 · Williams/FS/VH · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Hoskyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
Nathan Marcotte / Lisa Parker
2026-07-16 · Williams/FS/VH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Hoskyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-07 · Marcotte/FS/HO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emillie Vick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · Williams/FS/VH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Hoskyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-18 · Marcotte/FS/HO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emillie Vick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · Marcotte/FS/HO · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Janice Bower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-30 · Curtis/Greenwood/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emillie Vick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · Cunningham/FS/CM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Naomi Conley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-07 · Curtis/Greenwood/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emillie Vick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-30 · Cunningham/FS/CM · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-23 · Curtis/Greenwood/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emillie Vick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 63.5% of games
3.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 68.6% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer