← Search

Meghan Hammes

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 131W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Meghan Hammes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history189 matches
L
2026-08-28 · PW.Burkey · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alexandra Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · PW.Burkey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Dusina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · TOC.Siege · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Devon Siege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
Lisa Watkins / Lirong Zhao
2026-08-21 · PW.Burkey · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alicia Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-14 · PW.Burkey · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Kelly Williams / Sally Grogan
2026-08-07 · PW.Burkey · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alicia Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · TOC.Siege · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michaela Brannock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · PW.Burkey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ruth Dobson-Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-24 · PW.Hall · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Jennifer Johnson
2026-04-21 · PW.Federico · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-17 · PW.Hall · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Dusina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · PW.Federico · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Micha Federico
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
83.8%
31W–6L · 64% of games
3.5
70.4%
50W–21L · 58.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 43.9% of games
6.5
84.8%
28W–5L · 62.1% of games
7.5
45%
9W–11L · 46.6% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
45 matches
#1 Singles
9%
16 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe