← Search

Tonia Laflamme

MORRISVILLE, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
207 matches · 149W–58L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tonia Laflamme to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history207 matches
L
2026-09-11 · PW.Peeples · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzanne Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-10 · TOC.Armstrong · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Felita Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Katherine Jeske / Emily Johnson
2026-09-09 · TOC.Otsuka · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nagako Kikuchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-09-01 · TOC.Armstrong · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Naomi Rodrigues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-28 · PW.Peeples · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Libby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · TOC.Armstrong · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Libby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · TOC.Otsuka · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Keiko Fukuzawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-21 · PW.Peeples · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · PW.Peeples · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Libby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · TOC.Otsuka · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Felita Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-31 · PW.Peeples · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Singer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-21 · PW.Eichenseer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michaela Brannock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 75.9% of games
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.8% of games
3.5
81.2%
39W–9L · 64.2% of games
4.0
42.4%
14W–19L · 48.5% of games
5.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 76.7% of games
6.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 66.7% of games
7.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 56.5% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
50 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams