← Search

Ferebee Plyler

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 88W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ferebee Plyler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Ha.Cain18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · Ha.Cain18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Seely Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-03 · Ha.Cain18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · Cl.Capps18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Highsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Cl.Capps18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Capps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Cl.Capps18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Highsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-21 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-11 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
78.8%
26W–7L · 63.2% of games
3.0
92.3%
24W–2L · 71.8% of games
3.5
87%
20W–3L · 65.9% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 42% of the time
#1 Singles
42%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe