← Search

Courtney Chacos

Chapel Hill, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 16W–15L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Courtney Chacos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-03-31 · MHansen-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Whilden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-10 · MHansen-CHCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-29 · TDavies-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-06-22 · TDavies-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Braby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-05-21 · JMyers-CHCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-29 · #1 Doubles · with Marci Hansen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-15 · TDavies-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-03-18 · TDavies-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-03-11 · TDavies-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marci Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-02-25 · TDavies-CHCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-08-12 · 8-ADavies-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Karrie Tilley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-05-28 · 1*TDavies-CHCC · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 47.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Singles
13%
4 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams