← Search

Susan Schlegel

— year-end
63 matches · 26W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Susan Schlegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gloria Paumier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Toms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Slater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tiffany Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · Wisley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Toms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-29 · Campbell/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Toms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-29 · Steinhausler/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gloria Paumier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-27 · Wisley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Toms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · Wisley/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Constance Conley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-15 · Steinhausler/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Micaela Cignetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-13 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicci Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-08 · Steinhausler/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gloria Paumier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
Teams27 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.5% of games
3.0
39.3%
11W–17L · 46.5% of games
3.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 39.7% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert