← Search

Angie Ware

Arlington, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 30W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Angie Ware to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Lacy/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Durham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · Kinney/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brenda Kinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-29 · Mcmorran/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachel Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · Lacy/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · McMorran/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crista Mcmorran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · Moon/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Heimann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · McMorran/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crista Mcmorran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · McMorran/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauryn Yackel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-25 · Hurt/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · McMorran/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Kimberly Manuel / Candi McMorran
2026-04-04 · Hurt/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · Hurt/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
22W–11L · 56.6% of games
5.5
75%
6W–2L · 62.3% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
17 matches
#1 Singles
11%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal