← Search

Emily Stolnicki

Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 55W–41L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Emily Stolnicki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Picha/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Hurt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Madelaine Cable
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Madelaine Cable
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sophia Runer Folk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-11 · Steinhausler/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Blake Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · Picha/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Eddy/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
Melanie Schrank / Jennifer Lee
2026-08-04 · Steinhausler/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paige Swanquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · Belvin/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Paige
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-09 · Belvin/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Vestal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-02 · Belvin/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-26 · Belvin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Royal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
78.8%
26W–7L · 62% of games
3.5
41.2%
14W–20L · 47.8% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 71.6% of games
6.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.1% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer