← Search

Bhimasen Pradhan

Columbus, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 51W–50L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Bhimasen Pradhan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Sabo-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with L Scott Laymon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
John Morris / Felix Rijos
2026-09-01 · Steed-CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashish Pingale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
John Morris / Kerry Philip Baker
2026-08-13 · Chavez-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cesar Soto-Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-06 · Chavez-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashish Pingale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-2
W
Matt Edmonson / John Morris
2026-08-02 · Chavez-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rourke Stay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Juestel/Soto-Ramos-CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosana Juestel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · Juestel/Mardis-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosana Juestel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · Juestel/Mardis-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-16 · Juestel/Mardis-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Giovanna Guerra-Troche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · Juestel/Mardis-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosana Juestel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-29 · Sabo-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-16 · Sabo-CC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Gayler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
60.5%
23W–15L · 56.6% of games
3.5
42.9%
24W–32L · 46.4% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer