← Search

Chelsea Watts

Midway, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 38W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Chelsea Watts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Deer Creek Dolls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-27 · Heber Volley Gals · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
Addisyn Bliss / Isabelle Leake
2026-07-20 · Heber Volley Gals · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catherine Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Heber Volley Gals · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nike Hawkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Heber Volley Gals · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Naomi Stroud-Peterson / Jennifer Evans
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shana Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.5% of games
3.0
61%
25W–16L · 55.3% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe