← Search

Grant Sweitzer

Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 20W–10L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Grant Sweitzer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Hempfield - Triano / Cohen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Lingenfelter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Donahue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-4
W
2026-08-09 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Nalywayko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · Hempfield - Arters · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Lanc CC - Shelton · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-06-23 · Lanc CC - Shelton · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-12 · Lanc CC - Shelton · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-02 · Lanc CC - Shelton · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 63.6% of games
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 70.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 50% of the time
#1 Singles
50%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams