← Search

Julie Kratzer

— year-end
100 matches · 59W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Kratzer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Fath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Cabral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen ODonnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-08 · MTC Cousineau · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Hayes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-24 · MTC Cousineau · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rafael Garrido mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · Woodlake - Glen/Fath · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · MTC Cousineau · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Cousineau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · Woodlake ODonnell 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy McElgunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-22 · MTC Cousineau · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Cousineau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-19 · MTC Cousineau · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rafael Garrido mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
73.3%
22W–8L · 59.2% of games
4.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 53.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 62.3% of games
7.5mixed
56%
14W–11L · 51.3% of games
8.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#1 Singles
23%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe