← Search

Sophie Edwards

— year-end
74 matches · 56W–18L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sophie Edwards to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Faith Ruch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-30 · Gilless/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Audrey Thieffry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-26 · Gilless/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-24 · Carro/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Dent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-18 · Gilless/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Virginia Burbank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
Daniel Kim / Jennifer Carstensen
2026-07-11 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Wood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-27 · Alexander/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Rude mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clayton Eber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · Alexander/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Price Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-03 · Woodmansee/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · Moody/Memphis · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-04-19 · Moody/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams33 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.9% of games
3.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 57.9% of games
3.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 66.8% of games
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.4% of games
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.9% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 70% of games
3.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.1% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
25 matches
#1 Singles
27%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#2 Singles
16%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert