← Search

Jean Phebus

Memphis, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 35W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jean Phebus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Lunsford/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Akil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Denney/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Jennifer London
2026-05-02 · Hurt/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · Gronostaj/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Smythe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Marielba Briceno / Amanda Scott
2026-04-04 · Hurt/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
Hayden Malone / Kathryn Carpenter
2026-03-22 · Gronostaj/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Gillum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-21 · Hurt/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Bull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-08 · Gronostaj/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · Gronostaj/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Lunsford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-23 · Lunsford/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Heard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-11-22 · Nair/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Letitia Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2025-11-12 · Nair/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Yackel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
59.5%
22W–15L · 51.1% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 39% of games
5.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 58.1% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Singles
15%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams