← Search

Deise Berger

Collierville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 72W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Deise Berger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Gill/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathleen Uhlhorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-03 · Bender/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Missy Euler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Gill/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheryl Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Cindy Miller / Melinda Hoehn
2026-08-27 · Bender/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Missy Euler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
Haden Kane / Susan Knight
2026-08-13 · Bender/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-22 · Scifert/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Missy Euler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-15 · Scifert/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-14 · Hecht/Memphis · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-08 · Scifert/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-07 · Hecht/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Scifert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-01 · Scifert/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Missy Euler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · Hecht/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Scifert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 70.1% of games
3.5
90.9%
30W–3L · 65.6% of games
4.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 61.2% of games
6.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 67.5% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.5% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King