← Search

Katharine Schuler

— year-end
57 matches · 43W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Katharine Schuler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
Wang-Ying Glasgow / Emily Brown
2026-08-29 · Murdoch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Ellen Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · Schuler/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Ellen Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · Murdoch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Ellen Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Krista Barnhart / Cindy Miller
2026-05-03 · Ansbro/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Ogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-21 · Hecht/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lu Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Ansbro/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lu Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-14 · Hecht/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Silvia Hecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · Ansbro/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lu Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-08 · Hecht/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margo Gruen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-01 · Hecht/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Branston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Ansbro/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dee Pitawanakwat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-18 · Hecht/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Branston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
82.9%
34W–7L · 61.1% of games
8.5
50%
7W–7L · 50.4% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova