← Search

Don Busick

Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 58W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Don Busick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-01 · MAC McDorman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kasey Hammond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-05 · The Big MACs - Brod · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · MAC McDorman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsay Hardage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · The Big MACs - Brod · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Zima
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · The Big MACs - Brod · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
Donald Hoover / Andrew Smith
2026-05-03 · The Big MACs - Brod · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Samson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · The Big MACs - Brod · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-19 · The Big MACs - Brod · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Zima
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-12 · The Big MACs - Brod · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-03-08 · 6 MAC Holley/McDorman 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsay Hardage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-01-04 · 6 MAC Holley/McDorman 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsay Hardage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Newman / Gregory Moore
2025-10-25 · ACAC Jones 7.5 mixed · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
100%
12W–0L · 66.8% of games
4.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.1% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
85%
17W–3L · 60.6% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams