← Search

Jennifer Wilmer

Columbus, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 81W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Wilmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-05-08 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Welsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-24 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Tice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-21 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Eckelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Saad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-06 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Eckelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-01-23 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Smerdel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-01-05 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby McGill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-05 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Eckelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-11-24 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-11-21 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Eckelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
W
2025-11-17 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-10 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
56.9%
74W–56L · 51.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 37.5% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.8% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.3% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer