← Search

Jill Labetti

Nashville, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 47W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jill Labetti to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-07-18 · Carroll/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Cole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · Carroll/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Jorgensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-11-17 · Stephens/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kerry Elam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-16 · Stephens/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Geng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-11-11 · Stephens/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Tieslau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-11-10 · Stephens/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katharine Buliga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-15 · Stephens/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-10-13 · Stephens/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-10-08 · Stephens/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Tieslau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-09-02 · Steed/Rice/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Clair Bartholomew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-08-12 · Steed/Rice/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Clair Bartholomew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-07-26 · Carroll/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Dallas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.5% of games
3.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 67.2% of games
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.1% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.7% of games
3.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 71.1% of games
3.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova